This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 31, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 656
☂️ Prettier Formatting compatibility #2403
Labels
Comments
I haven't gone through the TypeScript reports yet. Something we should do in the near future |
MichaReiser
changed the title
📎 Prettier Formatting compatibility
📎 Prettier JS Formatting compatibility
Apr 14, 2022
MichaReiser
changed the title
📎 Prettier JS Formatting compatibility
📎 Prettier Formatting compatibility
Apr 14, 2022
yassere
changed the title
📎 Prettier Formatting compatibility
☂️ Prettier Formatting compatibility
May 8, 2022
Merged
Any update on this issue after the latest 0.7.0 release? |
The current update is exactly what you see in the description of the issue. Many tasks have been closed and the compatibility is getting closer. The main things to close the gap are parenthesis and member chain. |
Happy when I see only 10 checkboxes 😂. Your team has worked really hard! 🙏 |
Repository owner
moved this from In Progress
to Done
in Rome 2022
Aug 11, 2022
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
Description
Rome formatter's goal is to match Prettier's formatting as closely as possible where reasonable, and we have no good reasons to deviate.
This umbrella task tracks the syntaxes that Rome formats differently than prettier.
Statements
Module Items
Expressions
{
#2408will_break
#2720Assignment
Functions
TypeScript
ConstructorSignatureMembers
: Add a space between thenew
keyword and parameters #2419Literals
Infrastructure
Report of all tests that Rome formats differently than Prettier (created on the 12th of April 22).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: