You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Yes, you're right, there are a lot of things open to test -- but right now I just wanted to provide a quick fix for the Ackermann odometry, only rudimentary tested. Maybe we should open a new issue, tagged "help wanted" for proper testing of the steering lib -- starting with tests for the integrator functions, etc. But maybe first we should check for a redesign cf. #692
ok, I'll create a new issue then.
BTW, I just added this file 'test_steering_odometry.cpp', with some hard-coded tests. Is that the way to go, or do we want to have a more advanced testing style?
Should the expectations of the FW kinematics be true for all the different kinematic configurations? Then we could change this to a parameterized test as we have with JTC
ok, I'll create a new issue then.
Should the expectations of the FW kinematics be true for all the different kinematic configurations? Then we could change this to a parameterized test as we have with JTC
ros2_controllers/joint_trajectory_controller/test/test_trajectory_controller_utils.hpp
Lines 695 to 710 in 1d0d753
ros2_controllers/joint_trajectory_controller/test/test_trajectory_controller.cpp
Lines 1840 to 1849 in 1d0d753
Originally posted by @christophfroehlich in #921 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: