Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added qos autodetect #76

Conversation

gonzodepedro
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Gonzalo de Pedro gonzalo@depedro.com.ar

Signed-off-by: Gonzalo de Pedro <gonzalo@depedro.com.ar>
@jacobperron jacobperron self-requested a review July 6, 2021 20:37
Copy link
Contributor

@jacobperron jacobperron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One comment, otherwise LGTM!

Comment on lines 104 to 106
data_class = get_message(topic_type)
data_class = get_message_class(topic_type)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's the reason for this change? IMO, it seems like a backwards step. I would prefer to use the utility further upstream, all else being equal.

Signed-off-by: Gonzalo de Pedro <gonzalo@depedro.com.ar>
Comment on lines 42 to 44
from rosidl_runtime_py.utilities import get_message
from rclpy.qos import QoSReliabilityPolicy
from rqt_py_common.message_helpers import get_message_class
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need to also undo the change to the imports. We're using get_message from rosidl_runtime_py instead of get_message_class.

Signed-off-by: Gonzalo de Pedro <gonzalo@depedro.com.ar>
@gonzodepedro
Copy link
Contributor Author

CI build: --packages-up-to rqt_plot

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status
  • macOS Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@gonzodepedro gonzodepedro merged commit 716691e into ros-visualization:foxy-devel Aug 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants