Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: adding log entry to multi tenant test #2565

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 13, 2022
Merged

Conversation

fracasula
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Sometimes the multi tenant test fails waiting for an ack. I'm adding a log entry to check the ETCD connectivity at that time.

Security

  • The code changed/added as part of this pull request won't create any security issues with how the software is being used.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 13, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 43.84% // Head: 43.83% // Decreases project coverage by -0.01% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (bce2873) compared to base (4de6105).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2565      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   43.84%   43.83%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         187      187              
  Lines       39084    39084              
==========================================
- Hits        17136    17131       -5     
- Misses      20864    20871       +7     
+ Partials     1084     1082       -2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
processor/processor.go 71.23% <0.00%> (-0.83%) ⬇️
enterprise/reporting/reporting.go 9.77% <0.00%> (+1.43%) ⬆️
enterprise/suppress-user/suppressUser.go 82.71% <0.00%> (+1.85%) ⬆️
enterprise/reporting/setup.go 52.38% <0.00%> (+14.28%) ⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants