Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Plans for {dupree} 0.3.x #48

Closed
5 of 11 tasks
russHyde opened this issue Nov 11, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed
5 of 11 tasks

Plans for {dupree} 0.3.x #48

russHyde opened this issue Nov 11, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@russHyde
Copy link
Owner

russHyde commented Nov 11, 2019

Major

Minor

  • - dupree_package() and dupree_dir() should work on current-working dir by default
  • - tests that directly use the top-level entry points, eg, make a package structure in a subdir of /tests and run dupree, dupree_dir and dupree_package on it (Check that dupree_package works on windows #45 )
  • - bump min_block_size to 40
  • - fix dupree_package so that it assesses
    • - the R subdirectory of a given directory, rather than any subdirectory of the given directory that contains /R/ in it's name (found while running dupree_package on unitizer)
    • - the structure of the passed-in directory (are DESCRIPTION, NAMESPACE and R/ all present?) dupree_package should assert R package structure #57
  • - relative_path argument in dupree_dir and dupree_package to indicate whether the filepaths in the results should be written relative to the analysed directory (vs, as full paths) and also whether excluded directories/files are specified relative to the analysed directory relative_path = TRUE argument in dupree_[dir|package] #62
@russHyde russHyde added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 11, 2019
@russHyde russHyde mentioned this issue Nov 18, 2019
6 tasks
@russHyde russHyde changed the title Plans for Dupree 0.3.x Plans for {dupree} 0.3.x Nov 19, 2019
@russHyde russHyde mentioned this issue Feb 10, 2020
9 tasks
@russHyde
Copy link
Owner Author

Plans moved to #69

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant