-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
Deprecate the tempdir crate #45
Comments
Is there any way we can signal this change to users? If I hadn't been subscribed here, I'd have had no idea. |
Yeh, we'll definitely need to do that, I was hoping we could wait until there's a published version of Maybe we can add a notice to the readme here now pointing users wanting to open issues to @Stebalien do you have a plan in mind for the next release of |
Yes, it would need a 3.0.0. Issue here: Stebalien/tempfile#43 |
3.0.0 has been released. |
Awesome! This is exciting news! So the next steps would be to shift this repository into the @Stebalien Were you planning to do a release announcement for the new version for |
So... Those usually go on reddit but I managed to lose my reddit password and have found that I really don't make another account (I spend enough time just reading reddit as it is). Given that you did 99% of the work in this endeavor, want to make the announcement? |
No problem 👍 I'll put something together along with a note about the |
The announcement has been posted! I'll work on the RFC to shift |
:) I just came here to write an RFC for shifting into the deprecated org and found it was already here! I'll go ahead and close this one now. |
@KodrAus as you correctly note an RFC is required for deprecation. This crate should be moved back to the nursery until such a time as deprecation has been approved. |
@jethrogb What exactly do you hope to achieve by returning |
In Stebalien/tempfile#33 we combined the
tempdir
andtempfile
APIs, with the goal of using thetempfile
crate as the source of temporary files and directories going forward.I've gone through and review the open issues here (and basically just closed them all). I think the next step is to propose deprecating this repository and moving into
rust-lang-deprecated
, with a note in the readme thattempfile
is the place to go for temporary directories going forward.What do you all think? Is there anything else we should consider?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: