-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bad_git_dependency
test fails erroneously for 0.24.0
#4908
Comments
Even I'm facing this issue while building cargo 0.24.0 for Debian. Actually I did execute same command manually using cargo where error output is as per test case in 0.23.0 but different when doing it with 0.24.0. |
It looks like the error got introduced at this point 5c9665f as pointed out by |
The failure here is benign and comes about from using a different version of git2-rs than is being tested in Cargo today. The test here should be updated to be less strict about the output and error message. |
As there hasn't been any activity here in over 6 months I've marked this as stale and if no further activity happens for 7 days I will close it. I'm a bot so this may be in error! If this issue should remain open, could someone (the author, a team member, or any interested party) please comment to that effect? The team would be especially grateful if such a comment included details such as:
Thank you for contributing! (The cargo team is currently evaluating the use of Stale bot, and using #6035 as the tracking issue to gather feedback.) If you're reading this comment from the distant future, fear not if this was closed automatically. If you believe it's still an issue please leave a comment and a team member can reopen this issue. Opening a new issue is also acceptable! |
As I didn't see any updates in 30 days I'm going to close this. Please see the previous comment for more information! |
It seems the expected failure output does not match the actual failure output. The actual output still appears correct, just different.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: