Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x.py test (i.e. compiletest etc) should pass --diagnostic-width #657

Closed
1 of 3 tasks
pnkfelix opened this issue Jul 25, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed
1 of 3 tasks

x.py test (i.e. compiletest etc) should pass --diagnostic-width #657

pnkfelix opened this issue Jul 25, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
major-change A proposal to make a major change to rustc T-compiler Add this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler team

Comments

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

pnkfelix commented Jul 25, 2023

Proposal

x.py test (i.e. compiletest etc) should pass --diagnostic-width to avoid a dependency on the reported terminal width

Right now, odd environments may have a seemingly absurdly small terminal width, and this can currently cause our tests to break.

See discussion in https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/rustc_expand.20test.20failures.20on.20nightly/near/378563184

Mentors or Reviewers

  • pnkfelix can mentor or outright implement this.

Process

The main points of the Major Change Process are as follows:

  • File an issue describing the proposal.
  • A compiler team member or contributor who is knowledgeable in the area can second by writing @rustbot second.
    • Finding a "second" suffices for internal changes. If however, you are proposing a new public-facing feature, such as a -C flag, then full team check-off is required.
    • Compiler team members can initiate a check-off via @rfcbot fcp merge on either the MCP or the PR.
  • Once an MCP is seconded, the Final Comment Period begins. If no objections are raised after 10 days, the MCP is considered approved.

You can read more about Major Change Proposals on forge.

Comments

This issue is not meant to be used for technical discussion. There is a Zulip stream for that. Use this issue to leave procedural comments, such as volunteering to review, indicating that you second the proposal (or third, etc), or raising a concern that you would like to be addressed.

@pnkfelix pnkfelix added T-compiler Add this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler team major-change A proposal to make a major change to rustc labels Jul 25, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 25, 2023

This issue is not meant to be used for technical discussion. There is a Zulip stream for that. Use this issue to leave procedural comments, such as volunteering to review, indicating that you second the proposal (or third, etc), or raising a concern that you would like to be addressed.

cc @rust-lang/compiler @rust-lang/compiler-contributors

@rustbot rustbot added the to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting label Jul 25, 2023
@pnkfelix pnkfelix changed the title x.py test (i.e. compiletest etc) should pass -Z diagnostic-width x.py test (i.e. compiletest etc) should pass --diagnostic-width Jul 26, 2023
@davidtwco
Copy link
Member

@rustbot second

@rustbot rustbot added the final-comment-period The FCP has started, most (if not all) team members are in agreement label Jul 26, 2023
@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member Author

pnkfelix commented Jul 26, 2023

@ehuss reports that PR rust-lang/rust#113942 should fix all the cases where I encountered an issue here (basically, the tools are already taking pains to remove the contextual dependence here, and the rustc_expand tests were a special case that had to be addressed in a different manner).

Closing MCP as not relevant.

@apiraino apiraino removed the to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting label Aug 4, 2023
@apiraino apiraino removed the final-comment-period The FCP has started, most (if not all) team members are in agreement label Feb 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
major-change A proposal to make a major change to rustc T-compiler Add this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants