From 06302cb983198bdf6b984510d24673f4d0f49a98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Cantino Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:06:05 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Fix minor typo --- src/doc/book/closures.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/doc/book/closures.md b/src/doc/book/closures.md index d332cac7d8d1..3ed85c1a90b6 100644 --- a/src/doc/book/closures.md +++ b/src/doc/book/closures.md @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ fn call_with_ref<'a, F>(some_closure:F) -> i32 where F: Fn(&'a i32) -> i32 { ``` -However this presents a problem with in our case. When you specify the explicit +However this presents a problem in our case. When you specify the explicit lifetime on a function it binds that lifetime to the *entire* scope of the function instead of just the invocation scope of our closure. This means that the borrow checker will see a mutable reference in the same lifetime as our immutable reference and fail