diff --git a/tests/ui/consts/const_in_pattern/accept_corner_cases.rs b/tests/ui/consts/const_in_pattern/accept_corner_cases.rs
deleted file mode 100644
index d5b3908f35437..0000000000000
--- a/tests/ui/consts/const_in_pattern/accept_corner_cases.rs
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
-// run-pass
-
-// This test is checking our logic for structural match checking by enumerating
-// the different kinds of const expressions. This test is collecting cases where
-// we have accepted the const expression as a pattern in the past and wish to
-// continue doing so.
-
-// The specific corner cases we are exploring here are instances where the
-// const-evaluator computes a value that *does* meet the conditions for
-// structural-match, but the const expression itself has abstractions (like
-// calls to const functions) that may fit better with a type-based analysis
-// rather than a commitment to a specific value.
-
-#![warn(indirect_structural_match)]
-
-#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug)]
-struct NoDerive(#[allow(dead_code)] u32);
-
-// This impl makes `NoDerive` irreflexive.
-impl PartialEq for NoDerive { fn eq(&self, _: &Self) -> bool { false } }
-impl Eq for NoDerive { }
-
-fn main() {
-    const INDEX: Option<NoDerive> = [None, Some(NoDerive(10))][0];
-    match None { Some(_) => panic!("whoops"), INDEX => dbg!(INDEX), };
-
-    const fn build() -> Option<NoDerive> { None }
-    const CALL: Option<NoDerive> = build();
-    match None { Some(_) => panic!("whoops"), CALL => dbg!(CALL), };
-
-    impl NoDerive { const fn none() -> Option<NoDerive> { None } }
-    const METHOD_CALL: Option<NoDerive> = NoDerive::none();
-    match None { Some(_) => panic!("whoops"), METHOD_CALL => dbg!(METHOD_CALL), };
-}
diff --git a/tests/ui/consts/const_in_pattern/accept_structural.rs b/tests/ui/consts/const_in_pattern/accept_structural.rs
index 1f56f581c0270..ec66bae47e3a9 100644
--- a/tests/ui/consts/const_in_pattern/accept_structural.rs
+++ b/tests/ui/consts/const_in_pattern/accept_structural.rs
@@ -63,4 +63,18 @@ fn main() {
 
     const ADDR_OF: &OND = &None;
     match &None { ADDR_OF => dbg!(ADDR_OF),  _ => panic!("whoops"), };
+
+    // These ons are mor subtle: the final value is fine, but statically analyzing the expression
+    // that computes the value would likely (incorrectly) have us conclude that this may match on
+    // values that do not have structural equality.
+    const INDEX: Option<NoDerive> = [None, Some(NoDerive(10))][0];
+    match None { Some(_) => panic!("whoops"), INDEX => dbg!(INDEX), };
+
+    const fn build() -> Option<NoDerive> { None }
+    const CALL: Option<NoDerive> = build();
+    match None { Some(_) => panic!("whoops"), CALL => dbg!(CALL), };
+
+    impl NoDerive { const fn none() -> Option<NoDerive> { None } }
+    const METHOD_CALL: Option<NoDerive> = NoDerive::none();
+    match None { Some(_) => panic!("whoops"), METHOD_CALL => dbg!(METHOD_CALL), };
 }