From 5c0131641d2edfc21e4f627f94f0aadc6cfc6e47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?=E8=AE=B8=E6=9D=B0=E5=8F=8B=20Jieyou=20Xu=20=28Joe=29?= Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 16:27:11 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add regression test for rustc/rustdoc broken pipe ICEs --- src/bootstrap/src/bin/rustc.rs | 6 +- tests/run-make/broken-pipe-no-ice/rmake.rs | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tests/run-make/broken-pipe-no-ice/rmake.rs diff --git a/src/bootstrap/src/bin/rustc.rs b/src/bootstrap/src/bin/rustc.rs index 6f7ccde5e5bc7..18f5a1a58db93 100644 --- a/src/bootstrap/src/bin/rustc.rs +++ b/src/bootstrap/src/bin/rustc.rs @@ -136,10 +136,8 @@ fn main() { cmd.args(lint_flags.split_whitespace()); } - // Conditionally pass `-Zon-broken-pipe=kill` to rustc bin shim when this shim is *not* used to - // build cargo itself, i.e. set `-Zon-broken-pipe=kill` only when building non-cargo tools. - // - // See for more context. + // Conditionally pass `-Zon-broken-pipe=kill` to underlying rustc. Not all binaries want + // `-Zon-broken-pipe=kill`, which includes cargo itself. if env::var_os("FORCE_ON_BROKEN_PIPE_KILL").is_some() { cmd.arg("-Z").arg("on-broken-pipe=kill"); } diff --git a/tests/run-make/broken-pipe-no-ice/rmake.rs b/tests/run-make/broken-pipe-no-ice/rmake.rs new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..d1db0bc736883 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/run-make/broken-pipe-no-ice/rmake.rs @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +//! Check that `rustc` and `rustdoc` does not ICE upon encountering a broken pipe due to unhandled +//! panics from raw std `println!` usages. +//! +//! Regression test for . + +//@ ignore-cross-compile (needs to run test binary) + +#![feature(anonymous_pipe)] + +use std::io::Read; +use std::process::{Command, Stdio}; + +use run_make_support::env_var; + +#[derive(Debug, PartialEq)] +enum Binary { + Rustc, + Rustdoc, +} + +fn check_broken_pipe_handled_gracefully(bin: Binary, mut cmd: Command) { + let (reader, writer) = std::pipe::pipe().unwrap(); + drop(reader); // close read-end + cmd.stdout(writer).stderr(Stdio::piped()); + + let mut child = cmd.spawn().unwrap(); + + let mut stderr = String::new(); + child.stderr.as_mut().unwrap().read_to_string(&mut stderr).unwrap(); + let status = child.wait().unwrap(); + + assert!(!status.success(), "{bin:?} unexpectedly succeeded"); + + const PANIC_ICE_EXIT_CODE: i32 = 101; + + #[cfg(not(windows))] + { + // On non-Windows, rustc/rustdoc built with `-Zon-broken-pipe=kill` shouldn't have an exit + // code of 101 because it should have an wait status that corresponds to SIGPIPE signal + // number. + assert_ne!(status.code(), Some(PANIC_ICE_EXIT_CODE), "{bin:?}"); + // And the stderr should be empty because rustc/rustdoc should've gotten killed. + assert!(stderr.is_empty(), "{bin:?} stderr:\n{}", stderr); + } + + #[cfg(windows)] + { + match bin { + // On Windows, rustc has a paper that propagates the panic exit code of 101 but converts + // broken pipe errors into fatal errors instead of ICEs. + Binary::Rustc => { + assert_eq!(status.code(), Some(PANIC_ICE_EXIT_CODE), "{bin:?}"); + // But make sure it doesn't manifest as an ICE. + assert!(!stderr.contains("internal compiler error"), "{bin:?} ICE'd"); + } + // On Windows, rustdoc seems to cleanly exit with exit code of 1. + Binary::Rustdoc => { + assert_eq!(status.code(), Some(1), "{bin:?}"); + assert!(!stderr.contains("panic"), "{bin:?} stderr contains panic"); + } + } + } +} + +fn main() { + let mut rustc = Command::new(env_var("RUSTC")); + rustc.arg("--print=sysroot"); + check_broken_pipe_handled_gracefully(Binary::Rustc, rustc); + + let mut rustdoc = Command::new(env_var("RUSTDOC")); + rustdoc.arg("--version"); + check_broken_pipe_handled_gracefully(Binary::Rustdoc, rustdoc); +}