-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
regression: overflow evaluating requirement #113239
Comments
This seems to already have been fixed on the main branch and also on cca7ee5 (which is what I get if I run cargo-bisect-rustc with the HEAD of the beta branch). |
Hm, that rollup doesn't have anything obvious in it - can we bisect on main (master) or check the individual PRs in the rollup? Sounds like there may be a missing backport? |
I'm sorry, I might have miscommunicated. Running
That's exactly my understanding as well. However, I don't see an obvious way to find out which PR fixed/caused the issue. My first intuition was to check the beta branch, but cargo-bisect-rustc only seems to work on |
@hameerabbasi make sure you're building all tests too. this continues to fail on master. |
Ah -- my mistake. I'll do |
this now landed on stable. Following the suggestion of rustc to increase the recursion limit fixes the tests. This can be a legit solution, right? maybe worth reporting to the maintainer of the |
WG-prioritization assigning priority (Zulip discussion). @rustbot label -I-prioritize +P-medium |
I suspect that this is a real recursion limit hit because the html crate is a bit weird in being an automatically generated reflection of the HTML spec. However, if anyone's interested the regresison is somewhere in nightly-2023-05-24. |
Oh, for the record, that's due to #111807 it seems. New is_unpin check in codegen... |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: