Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Extend missing_doc lint to consts and statics again. #27161

Closed
brson opened this issue Jul 20, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Extend missing_doc lint to consts and statics again. #27161

brson opened this issue Jul 20, 2015 · 2 comments
Labels
E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.

Comments

@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Jul 20, 2015

Reverting here until this RFC is implemented.
@brson brson added the E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue. label Jul 20, 2015
@xiongmao86
Copy link
Contributor

This seem to be done in a recent merge.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Indeed! It was re-applied in #27575

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@alexcrichton @brson @xiongmao86