Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rpass valgrind tests failing #30383

Closed
nrc opened this issue Dec 15, 2015 · 0 comments
Closed

rpass valgrind tests failing #30383

nrc opened this issue Dec 15, 2015 · 0 comments
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc

Comments

@nrc
Copy link
Member

nrc commented Dec 15, 2015

All of them seem to be failing with

==17818== Syscall param read(buf) points to unaddressable byte(s)
==17818==    at 0x401A5C7: read (syscall-template.S:81)
==17818==    by 0x4005ED6: open_verify.constprop.8 (dl-load.c:1923)
==17818==    by 0x400621B: open_path (dl-load.c:2040)
==17818==    by 0x4008FED: _dl_map_object (dl-load.c:2270)
==17818==    by 0x400DA91: openaux (dl-deps.c:63)
==17818==    by 0x4010463: _dl_catch_error (dl-error.c:187)
==17818==    by 0x400E0C5: _dl_map_object_deps (dl-deps.c:254)
==17818==    by 0x4003117: dl_main (rtld.c:1614)
==17818==    by 0x4018594: _dl_sysdep_start (dl-sysdep.c:249)
==17818==    by 0x4004EA9: _dl_start_final (rtld.c:308)
==17818==    by 0x4004EA9: _dl_start (rtld.c:414)
==17818==    by 0x4000CD7: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.21.so)
==17818==  Address 0xffedf35c0 is on thread 1's stack
==17818==  in frame #1, created by open_verify.constprop.8 (dl-load.c:1681)
==17818== 

cc @rust-lang/compiler

cc @edunham - are we testing these on the bots?

@nrc nrc added the A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc label Dec 15, 2015
@bors bors closed this as completed in 95560c1 Feb 29, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant