-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix another circular deps link args issue #49672
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It turns out that the support in rust-lang#49316 wasn't enough to handle all cases notably the example in rust-lang#48661. The underlying bug was connected to panic=abort where lang items were listed in the `missing_lang_items` sets but didn't actually exist anywhere. This caused the linker backend to deduce that start-group/end-group wasn't needed because not all items were defined. Instead the missing lang items that don't actually need to have a definition are filtered out and not considered for the start-group/end-group arguments Closes rust-lang#48661
This was referenced Apr 4, 2018
alexcrichton
changed the title
Fix another circulare deps link args issue
Fix another circular deps link args issue
Apr 5, 2018
pietroalbini
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Apr 5, 2018
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 48ede3f has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Apr 6, 2018
1 task
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 7, 2018
…haelwoerister Fix another circular deps link args issue It turns out that the support in #49316 wasn't enough to handle all cases notably the example in #48661. The underlying bug was connected to panic=abort where lang items were listed in the `missing_lang_items` sets but didn't actually exist anywhere. This caused the linker backend to deduce that start-group/end-group wasn't needed because not all items were defined. Instead the missing lang items that don't actually need to have a definition are filtered out and not considered for the start-group/end-group arguments Closes #48661
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It turns out that the support in #49316 wasn't enough to handle all cases
notably the example in #48661. The underlying bug was connected to panic=abort
where lang items were listed in the
missing_lang_items
sets but didn'tactually exist anywhere.
This caused the linker backend to deduce that start-group/end-group wasn't
needed because not all items were defined. Instead the missing lang items that
don't actually need to have a definition are filtered out and not considered for
the start-group/end-group arguments
Closes #48661