You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I just came across the wonderful (currently unstable) commands comment_width & wrap_comments which I happily applied to a larger codebase and thought this is the end to comments spanning longer then 100 in width. But to my surprise after pushing the change I noticed not all comments was formatted. It appears that code that is within a triple tick section done below will not be formatted.
/// ```rust/// pub struct ImportantData {/// // This text will however not be formatted to adhere to the max length of comments even tough it will end up on the doc page just like other comments./// some_field: u32,/// }/// ```
This ends up looking bad in the source code as well on the doc page. The output can be seen in the screenshot below.
Is this expected? If so is there a way around this limitation, I have looked at the available commands to rustfmt but haven't found anything.
I have put together a minimal example of the issue here
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello!
I just came across the wonderful (currently unstable) commands
comment_width
&wrap_comments
which I happily applied to a larger codebase and thought this is the end to comments spanning longer then 100 in width. But to my surprise after pushing the change I noticed not all comments was formatted. It appears that code that is within a triple tick section done below will not be formatted.This ends up looking bad in the source code as well on the doc page. The output can be seen in the screenshot below.
Is this expected? If so is there a way around this limitation, I have looked at the available commands to
rustfmt
but haven't found anything.I have put together a minimal example of the issue here
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: