Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependencies (non-major) #487

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 19, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
antd (source) ^5.13.0 -> ^5.13.2 age adoption passing confidence
autoprefixer ^10.4.16 -> ^10.4.17 age adoption passing confidence
commit-and-tag-version ^12.1.0 -> ^12.2.0 age adoption passing confidence
css-loader ^6.9.0 -> ^6.9.1 age adoption passing confidence
prettier (source) ^3.2.2 -> ^3.2.4 age adoption passing confidence
stylelint (source) ^16.1.0 -> ^16.2.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

ant-design/ant-design (antd)

v5.13.2

Compare Source

  • 🐞 Fix that the inline rendering does not take effect when the preview.getContainer value for Image is false. #​47034 @​FEyudong
  • 🐞 Fix Modal static function with prefixCls breaks children other component prefixCls and thus bring the motion miss. #​47010
  • 🐞 Fix ok button of the DatePicker becomes compacted when used with Space.Compact. #​46769 @​Fatpandac
  • 💄 Optimize Tree draggable node cursor style and collaspe icon hover style. #​46974

  • 🐞 修复 Image 组件 preview.getContainer 值为 false 时,内联渲染不生效的问题。#​47034 @​FEyudong
  • 🐞 修复 Modal 静态方法配置 prefixCls 时,会改变所有子元素的 prefixCls 并导致动画丢失的问题。#​47010
  • 🐞 修复 Space.Compact 与 DatePicker 一起使用导致 DatePicker 的确认按钮样式错误。#​46769 @​Fatpandac
  • 💄 优化 Tree 拖拽节点和展开收起按钮的鼠标 hover 样式。#​46974

v5.13.1

Compare Source


  • 🐞 修复 Checkbox 组件在 @types/react 16 或 17 版本下 Typescript 报错。#​46962 @​crazyair
postcss/autoprefixer (autoprefixer)

v10.4.17

Compare Source

  • Fixed user-select: contain prefixes.
absolute-version/commit-and-tag-version (commit-and-tag-version)

v12.2.0

Compare Source

Features
webpack-contrib/css-loader (css-loader)

v6.9.1

Compare Source

prettier/prettier (prettier)

v3.2.4

Compare Source

diff

Fix incorrect parser inference (#​15947 by @​fisker)

Files like .eslintrc.json were incorrectly formatted as JSONC files.

// Input
prettier --file-info .eslintrc.json
{ "ignored": false, "inferredParser": "jsonc" }

// Prettier 3.2.4
prettier --file-info .eslintrc.json
{ "ignored": false, "inferredParser": "json" }

v3.2.3

Compare Source

diff

Throw errors for invalid code (#​15881 by @​fisker, @​Josh-Cena, @​auvred)
// Input
1++;

// Prettier 3.2.2
1++;

// Prettier 3.2.3
SyntaxError: Invalid left-hand side expression in unary operation (1:1)
> 1 | 1++;
    | ^
// Input
try {} catch (error = 1){}

// Prettier 3.2.2
try {
} catch (error) {}

// Prettier 3.2.3
SyntaxError: Catch clause variable cannot have an initializer. (1:23)
> 1 | try {} catch (error = 1){}
    |                       ^
Fix parser inference (#​15927 by @​fisker)
// Prettier 3.2.2
prettier --file-info tsconfig.json
{ "ignored": false, "inferredParser": "json" }

// Prettier 3.2.3
prettier --file-info tsconfig.json
{ "ignored": false, "inferredParser": "jsonc" }
stylelint/stylelint (stylelint)

v16.2.0

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekend" in timezone Asia/Shanghai, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Jan 19, 2024

This PR has 12 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +6 -6
Percentile : 4.8%

Total files changed: 2

Change summary by file extension:
.json : +6 -6
.lock : +0 -0

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@renovate renovate bot merged commit 9af69db into main Jan 19, 2024
5 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/dependencies branch January 19, 2024 19:54
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2024
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> 9af69db
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file Extra Small
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants