Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependencies (non-major) #431

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 28, 2023
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jul 28, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
antd (source) ^5.7.2 -> ^5.7.3 age adoption passing confidence
eslint (source) ^8.45.0 -> ^8.46.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

ant-design/ant-design (antd)

v5.7.3

Compare Source

  • 🐞 Fix Adjust the positioning of the Tour to be centered when the target is null. #​43694 @​linxianxi
  • 💄 Fix Watermark style issue in dark theme. #​43754
  • 🐞 Fix Button missing part React.ButtonHTMLAttributes issue. #​43716
  • 💄 Watermark use Design Token to support dark theme. #​43754
  • TypeScript

  • 🐞 修复 Tour 当 targetnull 时弹出位置不居中的问题。#​43694 @​linxianxi
  • 🐞 修复 Button 丢失部分 React.ButtonHTMLAttributes 定义的问题。#​43716
  • 💄 Watermark 将固定的颜色替换成 Design Token 以适应暗黑主题。#​43754
  • TypeScript
eslint/eslint (eslint)

v8.46.0

Compare Source

Features

Bug Fixes

  • 9803c7c fix: FlatESLint#getRulesMetaForResults shouldn't throw on unknown rules (#​17393) (Milos Djermanovic)
  • 42faa17 fix: Update no-loop-func to not overlap with no-undef (#​17358) (Matt Wilkinson)

Documentation

  • 4d474e3 docs: update with TypeScript info (#​17423) (James)
  • 091f44e docs: File extension named processor deprecation (#​17362) (Matt Wilkinson)
  • 9254a6c docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
  • 6d6dc51 docs: fix overlapping of open in playground button (#​17403) (Tanuj Kanti)
  • 7fc3a2c docs: Add private class features info to no-underscore-dangle (#​17386) (Matt Wilkinson)
  • da73e58 docs: Migrating eslint-env configuration comments (#​17390) (Francesco Trotta)
  • 80dffed docs: fix Ignoring Files section in config migration guide (#​17392) (Milos Djermanovic)
  • 8a9abb7 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
  • 7e9be4b docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
  • 0b0bbe0 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)

Chores

  • d1eb7e4 chore: Update ecosystem dependencies (#​17427) (Nicholas C. Zakas)
  • fab9e97 chore: package.json update for eslint-config-eslint release (ESLint Jenkins)
  • 6246711 chore: package.json update for @​eslint/js release (ESLint Jenkins)
  • 0aa0bc3 chore: Add PRs to triage project (#​17421) (Nicholas C. Zakas)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekend" in timezone Asia/Shanghai, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Jul 28, 2023
@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated

This PR has 4 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +2 -2
Percentile : 1.6%

Total files changed: 2

Change summary by file extension:
.json : +2 -2
.lock : +0 -0

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@socket-security
Copy link

Removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

🚮 Removed packages: eslint@8.45.0

@renovate renovate bot merged commit aba35bb into main Jul 28, 2023
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/dependencies branch July 28, 2023 22:27
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2023
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> aba35bb
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file Extra Small
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants