-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 480
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Intersection for more than two ideals #11879
Comments
comment:2
applies to sage-4.8.alpha3 and all doctests pass. |
Changed keywords from singular intersection sd34 to singular intersection sd34 sd35 |
comment:5
This patch conflicts with #4539 and should be rebased. |
Work Issues: rebase |
comment:6
Attachment: trac-11879_intersection-several-ideals.patch.gz Rebased on 4.7.2 with these patches applied:
The "conflict" was a blank line. |
comment:7
If you just did a simple rebase, there is no need to re-review it. You can set back positive review yourself. |
Changed work issues from rebase to none |
Reviewer: Julian Rueth |
Merged: sage-5.0.beta1 |
Currently,
sage.rings.polynomial.multi_polynomial_ideal.MPolynomialIdeal_singular_repr.intersection()
only takes one argument, while the singular interpreter accepts more.Depends on #9138
Depends on #11900
Depends on #11115
Depends on #11068
Depends on #11761
Depends on #4539
CC: @sagetrac-PolyBoRi @burcin
Component: commutative algebra
Keywords: singular intersection sd34 sd35
Author: Niels Ranosch
Reviewer: Julian Rueth
Merged: sage-5.0.beta1
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/11879
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: