-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 480
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Euler numbers revamp #17770
Comments
comment:1
What you're proposing seems like 4 tickets, not 1 ticket... |
comment:2
Replying to @jdemeyer:
It's not substantially more than any other symbolic function ticket. Not that there is heavy use that would justify several tickets. |
comment:3
Replying to @rwst:
Neither of this matters. The question is: can the issue be easily and naturally be split up? If the answer to that is yes, it should be done. I have just seen too often that a ticket does A, B, C and there are issues with C. These issues with C turn out to be much harder than originally thought. Therefore, A and B are never merged or merged with a big delay, even though they could have been merged quickly. Note: personally I don't care much about this ticket, so if a reviewer doesn't mind, then it's obviously not a problem. |
comment:5
See #20763 |
euler_number
fromcombinatorics
tofunctions
euler(n)=subst(bernpol(2*n+1), 'x, 1/4)*4<sup>(2*n+1)*(-1)</sup>(n+1)/(2*n+1)
(Charles R Greathouse IV)Component: symbolics
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17770
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: