-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 480
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Polyhedron.integral_points(): OverflowError: value too large to convert to int #21993
Comments
comment:1
Do you have a doctest to propose that takes less time to run? New commits:
|
Branch: u/slabbe/21993 |
Commit: |
comment:3
I don't think this is the correct fix -- after all, |
Changed branch from u/slabbe/21993 to u/mkoeppe/21993 |
Author: Matthias Koeppe |
comment:7
It works. The command
now takes forever (without error in the first minutes):) |
Reviewer: Sébastien Labbé |
Changed keywords from none to thursdaysbdx |
Changed branch from u/mkoeppe/21993 to |
I noticed the following bug in Sage:
(Note that this example would not get far with the code in Sage anyway because the code tries to use the rectangle bounding box method for all non-integral polytopes.)
CC: @novoselt @tscrim @vbraun @videlec @sagetrac-tmonteil @jplab
Component: geometry
Keywords: thursdaysbdx
Author: Matthias Koeppe
Branch/Commit:
76cd1ea
Reviewer: Sébastien Labbé
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21993
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: