You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
polymake has a simple implementation of the dual simplex method, which works with polymake's quadratic extensions.
It appears to be much faster than our InteractiveLPbackend. It is unknown (because no benchmarking has been done) how much of the speed differential is due to InteractiveLP latexing all intermediate tableaux.
We should make it available as a MixedIntegerLinearProgram backend. (Of course, there are no integer variables.)
polymake has a simple implementation of the dual simplex method, which works with polymake's quadratic extensions.
It appears to be much faster than our
InteractiveLPbackend
. It is unknown (because no benchmarking has been done) how much of the speed differential is due toInteractiveLP
latexing all intermediate tableaux.We should make it available as a
MixedIntegerLinearProgram
backend. (Of course, there are no integer variables.)This could be based directly on
or use
See also: #22710: Meta-ticket: polymake
Depends on #22452
Component: numerical
Keywords: polymake
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22724
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: