-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 491
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sphinx/docutils update for Sage 9.4 #31696
Comments
Dependencies: #30551 |
Commit: |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:5
Pushed the sphinx 4 update, with the usual batch of deprecation fixes. We should really try to get rid of the custom autodoc fork, most of the breakage comes from it getting out of sync with upstream. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:10
Replying to @antonio-rojas:
For the custom autodoc fork, we should just open a ticket and see what needs fixing when we remove it. May be not for 9.4, but we need to work on this. |
comment:11
Building the documentation fails for me with |
comment:12
Replying to @kiwifb:
How about #30893? |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:14
Thank you, that fixes the html build problems. The PDF documentation doesn't build though: the Japanese documents fail with
|
comment:15
Looks like sphinx-doc/sphinx@1d9eeed Anyway, this is where I give up. I never build PDF docs myself so I'm not really motivated to keep digging into this. |
Changed branch from u/arojas/sphinx_docutils_update_for_sage_9_4 to u/jhpalmieri/sphinx_docutils_update_for_sage_9_4 |
Author: Antonio Rojas |
comment:17
This works for me. Please test. I am happy to positively review everything but my own contribution. New commits:
|
Reviewer: John Palmieri |
comment:18
In fact I don't think all of my changes were necessary, but we don't need to include stuff about the French documentation in |
comment:19
PDF build works for me, setting to positive review as per comment:17 |
Changed branch from u/jhpalmieri/sphinx_docutils_update_for_sage_9_4 to |
We are at 3.1.2, current is 4.0.1
https://repology.org/projects/p/?inrepo=sagemath
Depends on #30551
CC: @kiwifb @antonio-rojas @jhpalmieri @slel
Component: packages: standard
Author: Antonio Rojas
Branch/Commit:
bc84af8
Reviewer: John Palmieri
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31696
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: