Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sage-bootstrap-python: Prefer pythons that support ssl with SNI #32405

Closed
mkoeppe opened this issue Aug 21, 2021 · 11 comments
Closed

sage-bootstrap-python: Prefer pythons that support ssl with SNI #32405

mkoeppe opened this issue Aug 21, 2021 · 11 comments

Comments

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

mkoeppe commented Aug 21, 2021

(from #32372 comment:10)

This fixes the problem on ubuntu-trusty-standard (https://github.com/mkoeppe/sage/runs/4128487418?check_suite_focus=true), which fails to download from upstream_url that points to pypi.io

CC: @fchapoton @slel @sagetrac-tmonteil @jhpalmieri @kliem

Component: build

Author: Matthias Koeppe

Branch/Commit: 48b7927

Reviewer: Jonathan Kliem

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32405

@mkoeppe mkoeppe added this to the sage-9.5 milestone Aug 21, 2021
@slel

This comment has been minimized.

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented Nov 7, 2021

@mkoeppe

This comment has been minimized.

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented Nov 7, 2021

Commit: 48b7927

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented Nov 7, 2021

Author: Matthias Koeppe

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented Nov 7, 2021

New commits:

48b7927build/bin/sage-bootstrap-python: Prefer a Python that provides ssl with SNI

@mkoeppe mkoeppe changed the title sage-bootstrap-python: Reject ancient pythons that do not support SNI sage-bootstrap-python: Prefer pythons that support ssl with SNI Nov 7, 2021
@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented Nov 12, 2021

comment:4

Let's get this in please

@kliem
Copy link
Contributor

kliem commented Nov 15, 2021

Reviewer: Jonathan Kliem

@kliem
Copy link
Contributor

kliem commented Nov 15, 2021

comment:5

LGTM.

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented Nov 15, 2021

comment:6

Thank you!

@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Nov 18, 2021

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants