-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 491
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GenericGraph.[weighted]adjacency_matrix, incidence_matrix: Accept keyword arguments for matrix constructor #33377
Comments
Author: Matthias Koeppe |
Commit: |
Last 10 new commits:
|
comment:3
I'm OK with this improvement, but the same should be done for These methods could benefit further improvements. So far we first feed a dictionary and then build the matrix. It might be faster to directly feed the matrix. |
Reviewer: David Coudert |
comment:4
Thanks for the feedback! Here's the corresponding change for |
comment:6
Replying to @dcoudert:
Yes, but I won't work on it in this ticket |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:10
I'll stop here, but the same could be done to For |
comment:12
LGTM. I will check the other cases. |
comment:13
For A question is whether we should allow passing arguments for the matrix constructor to methods calling |
comment:14
Replying to @dcoudert:
Thanks for checking! If |
comment:15
Thanks for reviewing! |
Changed branch from u/mkoeppe/use_numpy_integer_dense_for_adjacency_matrices to |
Depends on #32465
CC: @dcoudert
Component: graph theory
Author: Matthias Koeppe
Branch/Commit:
0bd2930
Reviewer: David Coudert
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33377
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: