Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix optional magma doctests that changed in magma-2.15 #5187

Closed
williamstein opened this issue Feb 5, 2009 · 4 comments
Closed

fix optional magma doctests that changed in magma-2.15 #5187

williamstein opened this issue Feb 5, 2009 · 4 comments

Comments

@williamstein
Copy link
Contributor

The latest version of Magma is Magma-2.15, and there are doctests all over that now slightly fail because the output format of certain things in Magma has changed.

The file at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/patches/magma-2.15.txt lists all the doctest failures. It was got by running this script:

        sage -t -only_optional=magma "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ring_generic.pyx"
        sage -t -only_optional=magma "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/term_order.py"
        sage -t -only_optional=magma "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py"
        sage -t -only_optional=magma "devel/sage/sage/crypto/mq/mpolynomialsystem.py"
        sage -t -only_optional=magma "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/magma.py"

on eno, which has Magma-2.15.

I think all the changes are purely cosmetic, so this should be very straightforward (but tedious).

Component: interfaces

Keywords: sd32

Author: Mariah Lenox

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/5187

@williamstein williamstein added this to the sage-4.7 milestone Feb 5, 2009
@williamstein williamstein self-assigned this Feb 5, 2009
@sagetrac-mabshoff
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin commented Feb 5, 2009

comment:1

It all seems to be

Graded Reverse Lexicographical Order

vs

Order: Graded Reverse Lexicographical

and

Lexicographical Order

vs

Order: Lexicographical

The question is: Do we make 2.15 the only officially blessed release or do we add a sufficient amount of dots to make the tests also pass with 2.13 to 2.14?

Cheers,

Michael

@sagetrac-mariah
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mariah mannequin commented May 24, 2011

Author: Mariah Lenox

@sagetrac-mariah
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mariah mannequin commented May 24, 2011

comment:2

I believe this ticket can be closed as it is superceded by #7870.

@williamstein
Copy link
Contributor Author

Changed keywords from none to sd32

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant