Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support multiple remotes #29

Open
sbrudenell opened this issue Jun 30, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

support multiple remotes #29

sbrudenell opened this issue Jun 30, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@sbrudenell
Copy link
Owner

sbrudenell commented Jun 30, 2024

we should support storing backups on multiple different clouds, to mitigate platform related risks.

looking at various object storage platforms right now, it looks like they all have free ingress and all (except b2) have costly egress. so I expect the naive strategy of just copying from the host to all configured remotes will be actually be pretty good.

this will probably be an improvement on cloud-to-cloud systems like AWS datasync, because we'll be able to e.g. customize storage classes per cloud.

@sbrudenell sbrudenell added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 30, 2024
@sbrudenell sbrudenell added this to the v0.1.1 milestone Jun 30, 2024
@sbrudenell sbrudenell self-assigned this Jun 30, 2024
@sbrudenell
Copy link
Owner Author

I should note that some very reasonable choices for pipe_through, like gpg encrypt, produce unstable output.

it would be unfortunate to always produce different output on different remotes. it would be nice to tee the output. this is a little easier to do with #32

@sbrudenell sbrudenell changed the title support multiple targets support multiple remotes Jul 18, 2024
@sbrudenell sbrudenell modified the milestones: v0.1.1, v0.1.3 Jul 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant