Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport "Check user defined PolyFunction refinements " to LTS #20700

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 20, 2024

Conversation

WojciechMazur
Copy link
Contributor

Backports #18457 to the LTS branch.

PR submitted by the release tooling.
[skip ci]

WojciechMazur and others added 2 commits June 20, 2024 15:17
`PolyFunction` must be refined with an `apply` method that has a single
parameter list with no by-name nor varargs parameters. It may optionally
have type parameters. Some of these restrictions could be lifted later,
but for now these features are not properly handled by the compiler.

Fixes #8299
Fixes #18302

[Cherry-picked e5ca0c4][modified]
Base automatically changed from lts-18663 to lts-3.3 June 20, 2024 14:57
@WojciechMazur
Copy link
Contributor Author

No regressions detected in the community build up to lts-18731.

Reference

@WojciechMazur WojciechMazur merged commit 3b94fb2 into lts-3.3 Jun 20, 2024
19 checks passed
@WojciechMazur WojciechMazur deleted the lts-18457 branch June 20, 2024 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants