Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update munit-scalacheck to 1.0.0-M12 #767

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2024

Conversation

scalameta-bot
Copy link
Contributor

About this PR

πŸ“¦ Updates org.scalameta:munit-scalacheck from 1.0.0-M11 to 1.0.0-M12

πŸ“œ GitHub Release Notes - Version Diff

Usage

βœ… Please merge!

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

βš™ Adjust future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "org.scalameta", artifactId = "munit-scalacheck" } ]

Or, add this to slow down future updates of this dependency:

dependencyOverrides = [{
  pullRequests = { frequency = "30 days" },
  dependency = { groupId = "org.scalameta", artifactId = "munit-scalacheck" }
}]
labels: library-update, early-semver-pre-release, semver-spec-pre-release, commit-count:1

Copy link
Contributor

@tgodzik tgodzik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's the last release on this repo

@tgodzik tgodzik merged commit 7197bea into main Apr 19, 2024
9 checks passed
@tgodzik tgodzik deleted the update/munit-scalacheck-1.0.0-M12 branch April 19, 2024 06:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants