You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The first implementation of Greencently (as a JUnit 5 extension) makes this tradeoff: in exchange for supporting only one test framework, it works no matter where or how you run the tests.
An IDE-plugin implementation could offer a different tradeoff: in exchange for running only within the IDE, it could work with any programming language and test framework the IDE supports.
For JUnit 5 users, there'd be no harm in using both. Either implementation could update the timestamp file and the pre-commit optimization would continue to apply.
This would open up Greencently to many more users. If they only ever run tests within the IDE, the pre-commit optimization will always apply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The first implementation of Greencently (as a JUnit 5 extension) makes this tradeoff: in exchange for supporting only one test framework, it works no matter where or how you run the tests.
An IDE-plugin implementation could offer a different tradeoff: in exchange for running only within the IDE, it could work with any programming language and test framework the IDE supports.
For JUnit 5 users, there'd be no harm in using both. Either implementation could update the timestamp file and the pre-commit optimization would continue to apply.
This would open up Greencently to many more users. If they only ever run tests within the IDE, the pre-commit optimization will always apply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: