We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This seems to be the only text completion model that makes sense supporting, as it costs 25% the price of GPT-3.5 Turbo.
In particular, it makes no sense to support Curie or DaVinci, as they cost the same or more, and seem to perform more poorly than GPT-3.5 Turbo:
model prompt completion comparison order 7 Ada Embedding 0.0004 0.0004 0.20 0 3 Ada 0.0004 0.0004 0.20 1 4 Babbage 0.0005 0.0005 0.25 2 5 Curie 0.0020 0.0020 1.00 3 6 Davinci 0.0200 0.0200 10.00 4 2 GPT-3.5 Turbo 0.0020 0.0020 1.00 5 0 GPT-4 8K 0.0300 0.0600 30.00 6 1 GPT-4 32K 0.0600 0.1200 60.00 7
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
This seems to be the only text completion model that makes sense supporting, as it costs 25% the price of GPT-3.5 Turbo.
In particular, it makes no sense to support Curie or DaVinci, as they cost the same or more, and seem to perform more poorly than GPT-3.5 Turbo:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: