You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 3, 2018. It is now read-only.
When a constraint is specified with a leading v, but the underlying version lacks it, or vice versa, it's correct to elide that difference and have both cases match.
I don't think we do this now, but I'm honesty not sure. Need some tests to check.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
At least half of the importance here is just clearly identifying where in the solving algorithm the decision gets made about what form we actually use. I'm pretty sure it takes from the vcs when populating the solution, so we should always be good as long as the constraint Match()es the version, but being really clear about this would be a plus.
When a constraint is specified with a leading
v
, but the underlying version lacks it, or vice versa, it's correct to elide that difference and have both cases match.I don't think we do this now, but I'm honesty not sure. Need some tests to check.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: