Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to use Solaredge info in HA #110

Open
SteveHoyt opened this issue Jan 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

How to use Solaredge info in HA #110

SteveHoyt opened this issue Jan 29, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@SteveHoyt
Copy link

Hi

I also posted this on the UDI forum

I opened the above topic back in June. The topic is now closed and I believe you and Michael were going to get together after he made some changes. See the 2 quotes below.

Quote
That would be extremely helpful. I jumped back in on Slack, just ping me if there's anything you'd like me to test. I'll hold off on progressing further with pyisyox on the profile downloads piece--I was at the point of trying to tackle Z-Wave node defs, so a good place to stop. Just FYI -- my intent is that once this module is stable, the original pyisy will be deprecated--I know there are still a few node servers out there that use that module. The new one has been re-written from the ground up to be much faster and fully asynchronous.

@shbatm,

Thank you very much! Will contact you as soon as we're ready.

With kind regards,
Michel

In any case I still have the issue with node values being just named "custom controls.

When I look at the data in HA for this node, I have a sensor entity id called "sensor.energy_last_15min". So far so good. Upon further inspection under attributes, I see custom control 0 -4 which has the rest of the data. So here is my problem/question(s). I have no idea what each custom control represents. I can figure it out by comparing what I see in the admin console to the values for the custom control.

  1. Is it unreasonable given this architecture to be able to have these custom controls broken out into specific attributes with a representative name.

I was wondering if any progress has been made.

Thanks

Steve

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant