Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MMS Group Message Thread Issue #7161

Closed
1 task done
Ste4thOverride opened this issue Nov 5, 2017 · 7 comments
Closed
1 task done

MMS Group Message Thread Issue #7161

Ste4thOverride opened this issue Nov 5, 2017 · 7 comments

Comments

@Ste4thOverride
Copy link

I have:


Bug description

If I create a group thread and add non Signal users and send a message to the group all of the replies come in as a new thread and not in the existing thread that I created. It appears that I am not added to the list of members when I look at the group members for the thread.

Steps to reproduce

Open Signal create group thread send message when recipients reply messages show up in a new thread.

**Actual result: Not added as a Group Member to threads I created
**Expected result: All Replies should show up in the existing thread I created

Screenshots

screenshot1

screenshot 2

Device info

**Device:Pixel XL
**Android version:8.0
**Signal version:4.11.5

Link to debug log

https://gist.github.com/41733f2a0f309fafed5be8a4a88e3f25

@FeuRenard
Copy link
Contributor

Related to #7091? In this case 4.12.x will fix this issue.

@Ste4thOverride
Copy link
Author

Not exactly the same issue I never created a separate thread and the message order is the same. It is the same issue as @wesdawg mentioned on that thread however.

I enrolled in the beta to receive the current version which is 4.12.2. Now half of the replies I sent have been added to the new thread that was created and all of the other messages are in one thread by themselves with no other messages.

I have deleted all of my group messaging threads which is a pain because they are not backed up by the export option. I will test and see if the issue is still on going after I recreate my group threads but it looks like it is not resolved entirely.

I wonder if it is related to the fact that Signal is not displaying my contacts phone numbers correctly. I have all of my contacts phone numbers stored in the format of Country code + Area Code + Phone Number. All with the hyphen between the phone number and area code but Signal displays some correctly and others without the hyphen.

@losingkeys
Copy link

I have this issue too. I've noticed this common occurrence:

  1. I text some of my family (they have iPhones w/o Signal at the moment)
  2. They text me back
  3. It comes in a group message with them and another number (mine w/the country code). Rather than saying "Me" in the list, it says "+1MYNUMBER" instead. Seems like Signal needs to recognize MYNUMBER as the same thing as +1MYNUMBER

@Ste4thOverride
Copy link
Author

Still not resolved in 4.12.3. I created a new thread and the message replies when I got them came back in a new thread. If this was in Broadcast mode this behavior would be expected but not in conversation mode. Updated Bug Report Below.

https://gist.github.com/8557c3714dec7b0a0fccf048f6b32baa

@ONUHWT
Copy link

ONUHWT commented Nov 21, 2017

I am also having this problem on my Google Pixel.
Android 8.0.0.
Signal 4.12.3

Let me know if I can provide any more information to help with debugging this issue.

@jeremymasters
Copy link

@ONUHWT @KatamariSanChan typically the devs ask that we don't add "me too" comments to the issues unless we have new information or a log file or something like that to add. If you want to "me too" something, you can add the reaction (thumbs up/down, smile/frown, etc). Otherwise this emails hundreds of people.

@automated-signal
Copy link

GitHub Issue Cleanup:
See #7598 for more information.

@signalapp signalapp locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 3, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants