-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Access Mode Extensions #85
Comments
Documentation of operations and access modes from discussions.
|
The WIP table here can be used to get a deeper understanding of operations and access modes. Operations may be determined by the nature of an HTTP request but they are not strictly limited to HTTP requests. For the time being, the table uses CRUD terms for simplicity and the purpose of this discussion - do not bother to nitpick on this. Happy to switch to use a different variation, RFC terms, or introduce 50 very specific terms. WAC ED loosely uses CRUD terms for common operations but it is not fixed to that.
I'm not sure what to do with this table yet / where to put it but we can figure something out alongside solid/specification#14 (comment) (even if it just serves to catch bugs or our assumptions).
[1] [2] Requires Append (or Write) on [3] Requires Write on [4] [5] Requires Write on |
Very helpful. Just a reminder that there is simple easy to understand argument to remove the Control Mode, with more logical/mathematical arguments to support that in Specification issue #303. Also, it should be possible to model your table using mathematical work on Lenses, to get at precisely why the different modes exist, and how they interact with the HTTP methods. |
The ACL ontology ( http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/acl ) defines
acl:Read
,acl:Write
,acl:Append
, andacl:Control
access modes.This is a general issue, a study, to document common operations and new access modes (based on use cases).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: