Apply effective temperature "penalty"

[jeanconn]

Since the starcheck calls to the proseco stuff are constructing an acq catalog from the commanded catalog and then getting calc_p_safe, I think the the proseco get_effective_t_ccd method is never called.

We probably want to use the penalty on the starcheck side too (for the time being, until sparkles checks are properly integrated).

[taldcroft]

I think this should be fairly trivial, namely just replace the call to get_acq_catalog to get_aca_catalog, with a few tweaks to the kwargs. The use aca.acqs instead of acq_cat.

Probably just need to add n_guide=0, n_fid=0. You don't have to change the include_* kwargs, but it might make the code more clear to use include_ids_acq (etc).

Going through the cat_aca_catalog function will engage the effective temperature machinery.

[taldcroft]

Which points to a general API recommendation of always using get_aca_catalog for making catalogs, even if only an acq catalog is desired.

[jeanconn]

Right, I think we had a bunch of proseco API changes after I figured out something for starcheck and I wasn't sure if this transition was worth it until we had include_ids_fids.

[jeanconn]

Closed by #309