You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Question. This issue tracker is not the place for questions. If you want to ask how to do
something, or to understand why something isn't working the way you expect it to, use Stack
Overflow. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/retrofit
Feature Request. Start by telling us what problem you’re trying to solve. Often a solution
already exists! Don’t send pull requests to implement new features without first getting our
support. Sometimes we leave features out on purpose to keep the project small.
➜ retrofit-2.8.1 javap -v retrofit2.Retrofit\$Builder|grep major
major version: 52
➜ retrofit-2.9.SNAPSPOT javap -v retrofit2.Retrofit\$Builder|grep major
major version: 58
Based on the ASG thread, looks like snapshots are shipping w/ Java 1.4 byte code unintentionally.
It would be nice to get them back to 52 so that i can use snapshot version :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What kind of issue is this?
Question. This issue tracker is not the place for questions. If you want to ask how to do
something, or to understand why something isn't working the way you expect it to, use Stack
Overflow. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/retrofit
Bug report. If you’ve found a bug, spend the time to write a failing test. Bugs with tests
get fixed. Here’s an example: https://gist.github.com/swankjesse/6608b4713ad80988cdc9
Feature Request. Start by telling us what problem you’re trying to solve. Often a solution
already exists! Don’t send pull requests to implement new features without first getting our
support. Sometimes we leave features out on purpose to keep the project small.
Based on the ASG thread, looks like snapshots are shipping w/ Java 1.4 byte code unintentionally.
It would be nice to get them back to 52 so that i can use snapshot version :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: