Build: add more sandboxes to CI tests

[yannbf]

Issue: #20886

What I did

This PR enables sandbox templates which were defined but still under inDevelopment treatment:

• html-vite js
• html-vite ts
• internal storyStoreV6 projects

Some tests were disabled for ssv6 given the lack of support for certain features.

Additionally, I changed the STORYBOOK_TEMPLATE_NAME variable to use the template key instead, which I believe everyone thought it was the key already, however it was using the readable name property.

How to test

1. CI should test them out and surface any issues (or lack thereof)!

Checklist

• Make sure your changes are tested (stories and/or unit, integration, or end-to-end tests)
• Make sure to add/update documentation regarding your changes
• If you are deprecating/removing a feature, make sure to update
  MIGRATION.MD

Maintainers

• If this PR should be tested against many or all sandboxes,
  make sure to add the ci:merged or ci:daily GH label to it.
• Make sure this PR contains one of the labels below.

["cleanup", "BREAKING CHANGE", "feature request", "bug", "documentation", "maintenance", "dependencies", "other"]

[yannbf]

@tmeasday @shilman it seems that the e2e to test the ordering of stories fails for ssv6. Is that a bug, should the test be changed or should the test be skipped for ssv6?

[JReinhold]

@tmeasday @shilman it seems that the e2e to test the ordering of stories fails for ssv6. Is that a bug, should the test be changed or should the test be skipped for ssv6?

I did some investigation on this, and I think it's a bug, and the failing test has caught that.

The docs pages in:

• internal/ssv6-webpack: Failing because "Another" is before "Basic" (both in the sidebar and in autodocs)
• internal/ssv6-vite: Correctly puts "Basic" first
• html/webpack5: Correct
• html/vite: Correct

I wonder if #18659 is related to this.

[tmeasday]

Sounds like a bug @yannbf! Yay for tests :)

[tmeasday]

@yannbf if you like disable the test and add an issue to fix+enable it?

[yannbf]

@yannbf if you like disable the test and add an issue to fix+enable it?

Done! Sorry for the poor description: #20941