Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build: Migrate @storybook/highlight to strict TS #22181

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2023

Conversation

kasperpeulen
Copy link
Contributor

Issue #22176

What I did

Migrate @storybook/addon-highlight to strict-ts
Small one!

How to test

Checklist

  • Make sure your changes are tested (stories and/or unit, integration, or end-to-end tests)
  • Make sure to add/update documentation regarding your changes
  • If you are deprecating/removing a feature, make sure to update
    MIGRATION.MD

Maintainers

  • If this PR should be tested against many or all sandboxes,
    make sure to add the ci:merged or ci:daily GH label to it.
  • Make sure this PR contains one of the labels below.

["cleanup", "BREAKING CHANGE", "feature request", "bug", "documentation", "maintenance", "dependencies", "other"]

@kasperpeulen kasperpeulen self-assigned this Apr 20, 2023
@kasperpeulen kasperpeulen added the build Internal-facing build tooling & test updates label Apr 20, 2023
@kasperpeulen kasperpeulen changed the title kasper/strict-ts-highlight Build: Migrate @storybook/highlight to strict-ts Apr 20, 2023
@kasperpeulen kasperpeulen changed the title Build: Migrate @storybook/highlight to strict-ts Build: Migrate @storybook/highlight to strict TS Apr 20, 2023
Base automatically changed from kasper/strict-ts to next April 25, 2023 07:45
@kasperpeulen kasperpeulen merged commit 1ff4b4f into next Apr 25, 2023
@kasperpeulen kasperpeulen deleted the kasper/strict-ts-highlight branch April 25, 2023 07:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
build Internal-facing build tooling & test updates
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants