-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Vue3: Fix reactive args updates in decorators #22717
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm testing this, i don't really like use destructuring unless we really need it.
I know that pointing the same reference may cause some problem.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
toRaw return the original object from proxies created by reactive().
and destructuring _args already kills the reactivity so i don't see the point.
Anyway i'm changing the sourceDecorator implementation, so it is ok for now. toRaw gives no reactive object
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the problem was that {...args}
only removes the reactivity one level deep.
And not when the args contain objects as well.
@chakAs3 Yeah, I don't like the spreading everywhere as well, but otherwise we get an infinite JSON structure 😅 |
Yes i know I may have a solution let me try it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems like the right approach, although I am not sure of the details on how to update the reactive args object.
@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ import type { PartialStoryFn, StoryContext } from '@storybook/types'; | |||
export default { | |||
component: globalThis.Components.Pre, | |||
decorators: [ | |||
(storyFn: PartialStoryFn, context: StoryContext) => storyFn({ args: { object: context.args } }), | |||
(storyFn: PartialStoryFn, context: StoryContext) => | |||
storyFn({ args: { object: { ...context.args } } }), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So the problem is assigning args.object = args
blows up stringify? I guess what we are doing in these decorators is pretty bizarre so having to do hacks is fine.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is right, it blows up stringify!
Okay, so then I just do it like this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kasperpeulen @tmeasday it is very weird to impose spreading args storyFn({ args: { object: { ...context.args } } })
in order for it to work,
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@chakAs3 what we are doing in these stories (assigning the whole args object into a single arg) is very weird, so I wouldn't worry about it (from a user perspective).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes i know i dealt with it when I was rewriting vue renderer, it was weird for me the first time but after that I found it legit and even useful, to alter the story's args, using the decorator that can cherry pick some args and passe them to single object prop for the component should work
// Compose the set of args into `object`, so the pre component only needs a single prop
// (selecting only the args specified on parameters.argNames if set)
decorators: [
(storyFn: PartialStoryFn, context: StoryContext) => {
const { argNames } = context.parameters;
const object = argNames ? pick(context.args, argNames) : context.args;
return storyFn({ args: { object } });
},
],
unless we are doing something wrong in the current Vue implementation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tmeasday check https://stackblitz.com/~/github.com/storybookjs/vue3-code-examples,
I have included all these cases and it just working fine. you don't have to spread your context.args
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@chakAs3 has something changed to make it no longer necessary? @kasperpeulen added the spreading because this change mean the args object became self-referential in these stories and thus created problems when it was serialized over the channel. At the time I played with it a bit and saw the problem too.
Vue3: Fix reactive args updates in decorators
Vue3: Fix reactive args updates in decorators
Vue3: Fix reactive args updates in decorators
What I did
When doing a decorator update with args, we used to overwrite the reactive args, that are made reactive in the renderToCanvas function. This PR makes sure we don't overwrite those args, but mutate them instead.
We test those decorator args updates in the hooks chromatic stories. I found out that they are accidentally accepted with a visual bug on next, when back porting a PR to main:
#22692
With this PR, args update should work again in Vue. At least the chromatic test are working again.
How to test
See the lib/store/hooks stories in chromatic.
Checklist
MIGRATION.MD
Maintainers
make sure to add the
ci:merged
orci:daily
GH label to it.["cleanup", "BREAKING CHANGE", "feature request", "bug", "documentation", "maintenance", "dependencies", "other"]