-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] Angular versions support #2467
Conversation
examples/angular-cli/package.json
Outdated
"@angular/platform-browser": "^5.0.0-beta.7", | ||
"@angular/platform-browser-dynamic": "^5.0.0-beta.7", | ||
"@angular/router": "^5.0.0-beta.7", | ||
"@angular/animations": "4.3.5", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the reason for this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wanted to check if it works with v4 (#269 (comment))
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release/3.3 #2467 +/- ##
===============================================
- Coverage 19.5% 19.45% -0.06%
===============================================
Files 386 387 +1
Lines 8709 8734 +25
Branches 931 946 +15
===============================================
Hits 1699 1699
- Misses 6301 6303 +2
- Partials 709 732 +23
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
import { platformBrowserDynamic } from "@angular/platform-browser-dynamic"; | ||
import { BrowserModule } from "@angular/platform-browser"; | ||
import { AppComponent } from "./components/app.component"; | ||
import { ErrorComponent } from "./components/error.component"; | ||
import { NoPreviewComponent } from "./components/no-preview.component"; | ||
import { STORY } from "./app.token"; | ||
import { getAnnotations, getParameters, getPropMetadata } from './utils'; | ||
|
||
let platform = null; | ||
let promises = []; | ||
|
||
// Taken from https://davidwalsh.name/javascript-debounce-function |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We already have lodash.debounce
in the project. Why not using it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we have it available than let's use it. I was under the impression that we didn't :)
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ | |||
function getMeta(component, [name1, name2]: any, defaultValue) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Where can I put this util ? It's duplicated in two projects: addons/knobs
and app/angular
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, @ndelangen, where would be the best place to put this util? 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was under the impression that there was an ongoing effort to remove duplicate parts of the code to a core package. Dunno if that's still a thing for 3.3 tho. We might just leave this as is for the time being and wait for that core module to be ready (?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I agree
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It was kinda decided to leave the refactor until after the initial release of 3.3, and release it as a patch. @shilman started the refactor branch, @Hypnosphi wanted to hold it off, if I remember correctly.
Where can I put this util ? It's duplicated in two projects:
addons/knobs
andapp/angular
Please give me a bit more context so I can answer your question
@@ -55,6 +57,16 @@ export default function() { | |||
new CaseSensitivePathsPlugin(), | |||
new WatchMissingNodeModulesPlugin(nodeModulesPaths), | |||
new webpack.ProgressPlugin(), | |||
// temp plugin to make webpack bundle only one v5 version. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
when changing a version of the example/angular-cli
to different than the one in the app/angular
or addons/knbos
- the v5 is bundled twice and causes to StaticInjectorError something-something
. I wonder will it be the same if storybook is used in a separate project (I think yes), should we put this plugin to the code base or document that people will need to add it explicitly
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please correct me if I'm wrong (probably yes) but shouldn't the angular version inside the @storybook/angular
s package.json
be used as a dep of storybook and the version in the consumer project be used for that (when using storybook in a separate project)?
Anyway, we'll need to test it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's say there is a project with this package.json
{
"dependencies": [
"@angular/core": "^4.x.x"
],
"devDependencies": [
"@storybook/angular": "^3.3"
"@storybook/addon-knobs": "^3.3"
]
}
I assume that the node modules structure will be like this:
node_modules
|- angular
|-- core (4.x.x)
|- storybook
|-- angular
|--- node_modules
|---- angular
|----- core (5.x.x)
|-- addon-knobs
|--- node_modules
|---- angular
|----- core (5.x.x)
So what webpack will do...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
uhm, shouldn't @angular/core
be a peerDependency to prevent exactly that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ndelangen, yeah, that was my first implementation. But after, we discussed it in this long conversation. In short, having a peer on angular will force us to be super backward compatible with the old versions, and we won't be able to adopt new angular things. For example, there is a thingy called InjectionToken
that used in app/angular
. It was introduced in v4 instead of the old OpaqueToken
from v2 (that became deprecated in v4). In v5 the OpaqueToken
was completely removed. In this case, with a peer on angular, we can't support the v2 (or we need to add some webpack replacement hooks). The alternative is to depend on the latest angular version, but in this case, we end up with 2 angular versions in the bundle (or 3 because of the described above). I hope I was clear 😞
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well to be honest, I think the situation of "it's a peerDependency and you have to make sure it's a version that's compatible with storybook/angular" is preferable to "it's a regularDependency and you better be using the exact same version or you're f%*&ed".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So if returning it back to peer we will have to deprecate angular 2. I am ok with this if you ask me, but I'm not familiar with the adoption rate of angular..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there any way to do some kind of feature detection and pick between OpaqueToken
and InjectionToken
based on what's available in actual angular version?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That what I've tried to do with webpack replacement, but turned out of this way. I think it won't scale if will need to patch every breaking change...
…n` warning with angular 5.
…ns-support # Conflicts: # yarn.lock
Just a question - Is angular supported by storybook? |
It will be from the upcoming release 3.3. But you can still try a beta. |
@alterx, @Hypnosphi, @ndelangen, @shilman, @danielduan I think we need to choose just one of the following ways to continue:
I think we need to choose between 1 and 2. We can always change it in the future. |
My vote is for option number 1. Let's deprecate Angular 2 and start from there. After that, if there's a feature that we really need from newer versions of Angular we can just state in the docs which versions of I think something similar to this was done with React pre-v15 |
I think it's ok now. Can someone test it with a few versions too ? |
…n` in webpack.config.prod
Signed-off-by: Carlos Vega <clmvega@gmail.com>
…ybook into angular-versions-support
Accepted in slack and skype =) |
@@ -34,6 +33,7 @@ | |||
}, | |||
"peerDependencies": { | |||
"@storybook/addons": "^3.3.0-alpha.4", | |||
"@angular/core": "=>4.0.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be >=
not =>
Having angular/core inside of the peerDeps will throw a "requires a peer of angular/core" warning on React / Vue projects that do not have angular inside their package.json? |
Hm, yeah that's the problem now if you use knobs. I will change the knobs back to work with the regular dep. |
@igor-dv alternatively, you can just remove the peerDeps (users will get their warnings anyway, from the |
Issue: Things from #269
What I did
util
that patches different angular versionsTested with: