-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 180
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
aggregate_verify
no longer accessible targetting wasm32-unknown-unknown
#227
Comments
Could you test #228? The omission was unintended... |
Hi, I've tested and can confirm that #228 does fix the issue! |
Cool! I wonder if you could tell a little bit about your environment. Is it based on wasm-pack or something else? In the essence the underlying question is if there is a way to perform github actions tests in an wasm32-unkown-unknown environment, and if you have any ideas/pointers to share :-) |
Of course! It's ultimately compiling into a wasm module, that gets linked against a custom module internally provided by our runtime. The code runs as the program in a tezos smart rollup, compiling against our SDK. We don't use We don't end up running any tests at all within a Hope that makes rough sense - happy to go into it more if you have any specific questions? |
Thanks! It doesn't sound like something I'd be willing to put together and maintain as GA test, too many moving parts... We do exercise wasi and emscripten builds, so it's not like wasm is in total darkness:-) And thanks for the report! |
Previously on
min_pk::0.3.10
, we were able to useaggregate_verify
successfully, when targetting wasm.However, on upgrading to
0.3.12
, this is no longer the case - as the method is hidden behind thestd
feature flag that we cannot enable.Is there any way to fix this? Is there a reason why that method would no-longer accessible on
0.3.12
? Currently, it's a breaking change in the API for us.We're using it to verify aggregate payload signatures from within a wasm32 program.
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: