Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial data: can we make BBH initial data with a large outer boundary? #4597

Closed
geoffrey4444 opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #5684
Closed

Initial data: can we make BBH initial data with a large outer boundary? #4597

geoffrey4444 opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #5684
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@geoffrey4444
Copy link
Contributor

Is it possible to make initial data that satisfies the following criteria?

  1. converges,
  2. completes within 24 hours of wall time, and
  3. is at least as accurate as initial data interpolated from SpEC?

If so, great. If not, what's the trouble, and can it be fixed in a ~month timescale?

@geoffrey4444 geoffrey4444 changed the title Can we make BBH initial data with a large outer boundary? Initial data: can we make BBH initial data with a large outer boundary? Jan 12, 2023
@geoffrey4444 geoffrey4444 self-assigned this Jan 25, 2023
@geoffrey4444
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AlexCarpenter46 try setting "massive" to false

@nilsvu
Copy link
Member

nilsvu commented Sep 6, 2023

Results from debugging this:

  • Set Discretization.DiscontinuousGalerkin.Massive: False
  • Tighten the linear solver tolerances sufficiently, e.g. 1e-10 relative and absolute residual.
  • Configure the RadiallyCompressedCoordinates option, observe it, and use in generate-xdmf --coordinates RadiallyCompressedCoordinates
  • An issue on higher multigrid levels seems to remain. Set LinearSolver.Multigrid.MaxLevels: 1 for now.

With these settings I am able to produce BBH initial data with an outer boundary at 1e10.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants