[develop] gh doesn't work in OrgMode files when Spacemacs freshly opened

[swaroopch]

As of 350f809 in develop branch:

1. Exit and Open Spacemacs again
2. Navigate to an OrgMode file
3. Press gh - it says g h is undefined
4. Press i (get into insert mode) and Esc (back into normal mode)
5. Press gh - now works as expected

[robbyoconnor]

I would look to see if any commits introduced after that introduced this regression...

[TheBB]

Is this still an issue? I can't reproduce. The org layer is enabled, right?

[swaroopch]

Still happens for me. Yes, org layer is enabled.

System Info

• OS: darwin
• Emacs: 24.5.1
• Spacemacs: 0.104.0
• Spacemacs branch: develop (rev. 21146f4)
• Distribution: spacemacs
• Layers:

(emacs-lisp org)

[moesasji]

@TheBB: Bug is present for me on 0.104.4 as well, so this one can be reproduced for the current stable release.

Note that this PR might be related to #3596 (same way to reproduce and also mention gh)

System Info

• OS: gnu/linux
• Emacs: 24.5.1
• Spacemacs: 0.104.4
• Spacemacs branch: master (rev. f04bb61)
• Distribution: spacemacs
• Layers:

(auto-completion emacs-lisp latex org
                 (shell :variables shell-default-height 30 shell-default-position 'bottom)
                 syntax-checking)

[TheBB]

Thanks for pointing that issue out. Since it's older I will close this as a duplicate, let's move the discussion there.

This is a strange error, but I still can't repro it.

[TheBB]

Sorry, this one is the older one. :-D

[moesasji]

I switched to the development branch to check and on the develop I can't reproduce this issue. So it looks like this issue might be fixed on develop, while it is a valid bug for the 0.104 branch.

btw) Shocking how much smoother/faster develop is compared to stable

System Info

• OS: gnu/linux
• Emacs: 24.5.1
• Spacemacs: 0.105.0
• Spacemacs branch: develop (rev. 9e5e309)
• Distribution: spacemacs
• Layers:

(auto-completion emacs-lisp latex org
                 (shell :variables shell-default-height 30 shell-default-position 'bottom)
                 syntax-checking)

[TheBB]

That's good. If you feel so inclined you can bisect to find out when it was fixed. I'm guessing it was in 48edef1.

Since it sounded like it was very easily reproduced on master, I believe it's fixed so I will label it as such.

[swaroopch]

I can confirm that this is fixed in develop.