Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Assess org-projectile; consider replacing org-repo-todo with it #3405

Closed
Josh-Tilles opened this issue Oct 14, 2015 · 7 comments
Closed

Assess org-projectile; consider replacing org-repo-todo with it #3405

Josh-Tilles opened this issue Oct 14, 2015 · 7 comments

Comments

@Josh-Tilles
Copy link
Contributor

Honestly, I'm not sure that one is better than the other, but I noticed that the org-projectile project seems to be more actively developed.

@TheBB
Copy link
Collaborator

TheBB commented Oct 15, 2015

Since org-repo-todo is broken, seems promising (assuming org-projectile isn't broken, obviously).

@ridget
Copy link

ridget commented Oct 19, 2015

@TheBB this is something Im interested in, what's involved/required for the evaluation? Happy to submit a PR for the org mode layer if this has already been done?

@AdrieanKhisbe
Copy link
Contributor

Up :)
Interested in that too!

@mkaito
Copy link
Contributor

mkaito commented Jan 4, 2016

👍

@syl20bnr
Copy link
Owner

syl20bnr commented Jul 5, 2016

Done in develop thanks to @TheBB 💜

@leezu
Copy link
Contributor

leezu commented Aug 8, 2016

Thanks for the work!

It seems however that

  (org-projectile:per-repo)

is called even if org-projectile-file is set to an absolute path. Calling per-repo means that org-projectile is used in per-repo mode. Looking at the documentation this seems like an optional feature that should only be enabled if org-projectile-file is set to a relative path.

For me this results in the behaviour that org-projectile-file is ignored, if set to an absolute path.

@d12frosted
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixed with released of Spacemacs v0.200. Let us know if you still have any problems with this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants