feat: contract auto acceptance #4177
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
brianp
force-pushed
the
constitution-auto-acceptance
branch
from
1547b1a to
2659a53
Compare
brianp
changed the title
brianp
force-pushed
the
constitution-auto-acceptance
branch
2 times, most recently
from
3d0c8c6 to
2bed082
Compare
brianp
changed the title
We need to work out some other kinks before this will pass but we do want this spec in the future.
brianp
force-pushed
the
constitution-auto-acceptance
branch
from
2bed082 to
44c36ea
Compare
stringhandler
approved these changes
Jun 9, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Add the configuration for VN auto acceptance. After finding constitutions you can be a part of, auto respond with an acceptance.
Motivation and Context
to make it very easy for VN to become part of committees.
How Has This Been Tested?
YOLO.I joke, i'll write a spec for it before merge.Spec written but we've got some other bits we need to work out to get the specs passing again.
Tested manually and the process worked but transaction is rejected by the base node due to an input bug trying to utilize the contract as an input.