Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: remove ablity to send 1-sided tx #6367

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 20, 2024

Conversation

SWvheerden
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Removes the ability to send one-sided transactions from the CW, preferring to only send stealth one-sided

Motivation and Context

There is no benefit for sending normal one-sided, only negatives in regard to privacy

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 3, 2024

Test Results (CI)

    3 files    120 suites   44m 37s ⏱️
1 295 tests 1 295 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
3 877 runs  3 877 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit e22dfca.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@ghpbot-tari-project ghpbot-tari-project added P-acks_required Process - Requires more ACKs or utACKs P-reviews_required Process - Requires a review from a lead maintainer to be merged labels Jun 3, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 3, 2024

Test Results (Integration tests)

 2 files  + 2   1 errors  9 suites  +9   12m 8s ⏱️ + 12m 8s
19 tests +19  15 ✅ +15  0 💤 ±0   4 ❌ + 4 
27 runs  +27  15 ✅ +15  0 💤 ±0  12 ❌ +12 

For more details on these parsing errors and failures, see this check.

Results for commit e22dfca. ± Comparison against base commit 97b5128.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@SWvheerden SWvheerden force-pushed the removeCW1-sidesend branch from c2fdb6c to 95218cb Compare June 4, 2024 09:14
Copy link
Contributor

@hansieodendaal hansieodendaal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about the one-sided code in the transaction service and scanning service? Maybe it should be removed in this PR as well.

@SWvheerden
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I want to keep that in for now, until we know exactly how we want to work with exchanges, they want want to use it. So for now I am only removing the front end calling

hansieodendaal
hansieodendaal previously approved these changes Jun 7, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@hansieodendaal hansieodendaal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@ghpbot-tari-project ghpbot-tari-project removed the P-reviews_required Process - Requires a review from a lead maintainer to be merged label Jun 7, 2024
@SWvheerden SWvheerden force-pushed the removeCW1-sidesend branch from 95218cb to a13f3f0 Compare June 18, 2024 12:54
@ghpbot-tari-project ghpbot-tari-project added the P-reviews_required Process - Requires a review from a lead maintainer to be merged label Jun 18, 2024
@SWvheerden SWvheerden merged commit b773173 into tari-project:development Jun 20, 2024
14 of 16 checks passed
@SWvheerden SWvheerden deleted the removeCW1-sidesend branch June 20, 2024 06:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
P-acks_required Process - Requires more ACKs or utACKs P-reviews_required Process - Requires a review from a lead maintainer to be merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants