You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Yes, there are some weirdnesses with Lavaan or OpenMx WLS(MV) implementations that make them disagree. Others have reported inconsistencies between Lavaan and MPlus. At least we can triangulate a bit - and with two of them being open source we can actually figure out WHY they differ if they do.
For more complicated modeling, OpenMx will be faster than Lavaan due to using C++ instead of R for computation & optimization. However, for WLS, where the weight matrix has to be inverted only once, most of the heavy lifting has already been done, with WLS model-fitting proceeding very rapidly.
Consider wrappers for the GWAS pipeline also.
https://github.com/MichelNivard/GenomicSEM/wiki
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: