-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
r/databricks_workspace: support for workspace parameters #3889
Conversation
hey @notchairmk Thanks for this PR :) Taking a look through whilst this approach works, there's several limitations to it (for example, where we're unable to provide validation for the specific fields to confirm that a Resource ID is a Resource ID at In the As such - could we update this PR to take a similar approach? Thanks! |
Just to add an update here: I've opened a PR on the Swagger repository making this a struct rather than a dictionary, so that we can expose this accordingly: Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#6917 |
Okay awesome, that is what I wasn't sure how to get done. Thanks! |
@notchairmk, we just merged v38 of the sdk today, so this should be unblocked! |
9cf1b5b
to
e45486c
Compare
e45486c
to
e54e6d5
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for updating the PR @notchairmk, just one comment left about nil checks that once addressed this should be good to merge
azurerm/internal/services/databricks/resource_arm_databricks_workspace.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
azurerm/internal/services/databricks/resource_arm_databricks_workspace.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
azurerm/internal/services/databricks/resource_arm_databricks_workspace.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
azurerm/internal/services/databricks/resource_arm_databricks_workspace.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
thanks @katbyte, updated, all suggestions should now be addressed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @notchairmk,
This looks great now, however could you merge in master so we can ensure all the travis CI checks pass? thanks!
4cfc103
to
d50a0ca
Compare
d50a0ca
to
1cfcc51
Compare
Alright, rebased off of master and fixed spacing for tflint. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @notchairmk! LGTM now 👍
This has been released in version 1.42.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example: provider "azurerm" {
version = "~> 1.42.0"
}
# ... other configuration ... |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks! |
Allows for optional map of workspace parameter key/values (e.g.
customPrivateSubnetName
,customPublicSubnetName
). https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/databricks/workspaces/createorupdate#workspaceThe list of accepted parameter keys included in the doc updates was provided in a response through the sdk with a disallowed parameter. Can't find the list in any other documentation though.
Includes test updates.
Fixes #3001