-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Groundwork for Custom Timeouts #4475
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great! 🚀
This has been released in version 1.36.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example: provider "azurerm" {
version = "~> 1.36.0"
}
# ... other configuration ... |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks! |
This PR contains the necessary groundwork to support Custom Timeouts on both Resources and Data Sources
Whilst this functionality is controlled by a feature toggle (which is intentionally disabled by default) - in it's current form this functionality has no effect on existing resources, therefore it's intentionally not documented or recommended for use at this time.
When the context changes have been threaded through all of the resources, in a future 1.x release we'll document this behaviour so that users can opt into this - however at this time this functionality is unsupported.
Given this is feature toggled we should be able to add timeouts gradually to resources, internally if the feature toggle is disabled any timeouts defined on resources will be removed, leading to the same behaviour as today - for example:
Given the following configuration:
Without the feature enabled:
With the feature enabled:
(this obviously works with a more sane timeout configured, 2s/4s are an example)
The (acceptance) test suite itself intentionally doesn't configure any timeouts in the Check Func's since we should continue polling until we have a conclusion
Longer term this unblocks #171 (and related issues like #1747) which forms a part of #2807